But anger is not the evidence. The evidence is the reason I can be specific: dates, amounts, TXIDs, screenshots, recordings and the saved company response.
The public company response to my complaint
LioGames publicly disputed important parts of my account. In the saved response, the company said my account was not suspended or blocked and said it could not find the $5,000 deposit I described; it also said the largest deposit it saw was $500 on July 14.
Saved copy of the public response included in this site's evidence set. See provenance and checksum details.
Why that reply made me more determined to publish the evidence
Being told publicly that the deposit could not be found was exactly why I needed the blockchain hashes visible in one place. The two July 24 transfers I rely on total 4,919.57 USDT. A TXID does not prove every part of my story, but it is not a vague memory either — and it directly contradicts a company that says it cannot find my money.
Open the direct BscScan transaction links →
The access/support timeline
I sent two larger USDT transfers
4,119 USDT and 800.57 USDT were sent on-chain. Those hashes are independently checkable.
Normal account access stopped working
This is where frustration turned into anger. Thousands of dollars were at issue and I spent roughly four days trying to get a useful resolution — and never received one.
LioGames publicly disputed my account of what happened
The saved public response disputed the way I described both the account state and the deposit.
Access returned and I started recording
I saved screenshots and two screen recordings because I no longer wanted the dispute to depend only on memory or support messages.
Another reseller lost $5,000 the same way
July 27, 2026 — days before my complaint went public, another shop owner posted this on LioGames' review page: "$5,000 lost, account lock… this site has seller plan called 'H2H', its required 5-10k deposit first to achieve lower prices. I did deposit 5000$ 4 days ago and my account locked and earsed all money inside it… support ignoring for 4 days… this is big SCAM."
Same plan (H2H). Same deposit size ($5,000). Same account lock. Same four days of ignored support. That is not a coincidence — that is a pattern.
Independent security vendors agree: Gridinsoft classifies distribution.liogames.com as a "Scam Website" with a 9/100 trust score, citing heuristic scam signals and blacklisting.
- LioGames review page — read the 1-star reseller reports ↗
- Gridinsoft: distribution.liogames.com classified as Scam Website (9/100) ↗
How I read LioGames reviews and complaint sites
I would not decide whether to risk thousands of dollars based on a star rating alone. Review scores change, moderation systems differ and many reviews contain almost no evidence. I look for recent detailed reports, records that can be checked, patterns across sources and whether a company response actually addresses the evidence raised. On LioGames' page the pattern is clear: small orders get warm replies, resellers with large deposits get disputed.
Where my complaint fits
My complaint is one person's case with primary material attached — plus at least one other reseller with the identical pattern. Some parts are independently verifiable; some parts remain my account of internal events. The site labels that distinction instead of pretending every sentence has the same evidentiary weight.
Corrections and right of reply
If LioGames provides verifiable evidence that materially changes a factual statement on this site, I will correct the statement and date the change. I will not remove my opinion simply because the company disagrees with it, but factual corrections belong in the public record.